As a great admirer of the message and work of Dinesh D’Souza, I was disappointed in the movie INFIDEL. The story line is being marketed as a political thriller of a patriotic Christian advocate who willingly puts himself in harm’s way for the sake of the gospel, thereby suffering physical persecution at the hands of radical Muslims. “INFIDEL tells a story ripped from the headlines. It is a fictional narrative based on true events.”

It is unfortunate that D’Souza did not simply retell, and recreate the true events. The authentic story line would be more believable than the fictious narrative. The real characters would, no doubt, be more sympathetic than the personas created by Jim Caviezel and Claudia Karvan.

Jim Caviezel plays an American journalist, Doug Rawlins, an internationally known Blogger, who is kidnapped while attending a conference on peaceful religious co-existence in Cairo, Egypt. Why his leading Iranian kidnapper speaks with a British accent is just one of many disconcerting facets of the film. It is possible the character the kidnapper portrays reflects someone like Mohammed Emwazi (17 August 1988 – 12 November 2015), an evil British-Kuwaiti militant believed to be the person seen in several videos produced by the Islamist extremist group ISIL showing the beheadings of a number of captives in 2014 and 2015. He became known as Jihadi John.

Claudia Karvan, as Elizabeth Rawlins, appears in the opening scene as a foul mouthed, willful, and defiant wife, who is angry with God for the death of an unborn child due to a car crash. Elizabeth is not supportive of her husband’s evangelistic efforts to bring the message of Jesus Christ to the world. Her anger and defiance remain throughout the movie. When Elizabeth has a chance to share her testimony with a house church in Iran, she walks out on God’s people without a word of hope, encouragement, or blessing. Her focus is to get her husband back. No one, and nothing else, seems to matter to her, and that is a tragedy.

If Christians are looking for an iconic role model in the movie, none will be found, and that too is sad, because the Church needs individuals today of unshakeable faith and courage. The testimony of Doug Rawlins is greatly diminished at critical moments, though in the end he does stand firm against every effort to get him to renounce his faith in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior.

For whatever reasons, the worldly and secular influence of Hollywood on a faith-based movie is made evident. Many of the stereo typical elements of being politically correct are present. There is gratuitous vulgarity, and the salacious promise of graphic nudity, of which there is none. The story line promotes the Christian underground church inside Iran, led primarily by women. The message is received:  men are toxic, masculine, and mean; women are sweet, heroic and compassionate.

Christians are relatively new to making quality faith-based films, so some latitude must be given. But if the objective is to speak truth to the world, and uphold traditional values of the family undergirded by the Judeo-Christian faith, then better use must be made of the powerful tool of the silver screen. Movie directors should have the characters speak simply, and plainly, against honor killing of Muslim women, and the mutilation of their bodies in the name of modesty. Let the truth go forth that faithful Muslims, who truly believe their Koran, will kill, or enslave, every Christian, in the name of Allah, if given a chance.

Those who seek to make patriotic faith-based movies must continue to promote the Christian message, and exalt the personal courage of godly people against all odds. Magnify the deeds of those who suffer for the cause of Christ, and do not diminish their ordeals. INFIDEL, the movie, has room for improvement. Hopefully, D’Souza will learn, and improve with future projects.


  1. I don’t think this guy saw the same movie I just did. This guy wants a movie made up of statues — not real people. This is a GREAT movie, and shame on you for not supporting such a WORTHY endeavor. Your article is nothing but a hit-piece.

  2. I agree with Curt. This movie has the opportunity to be seen by the masses and deliver an important message. While the author of this blog feels the portrayal of wife who is angry at God is unrealistic I think it is very realistic. I did not enjoy the violence or language, but I think it might be a better portrayal of what is real than a fake Christian who never has a misstep.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s